Non-functionals, who cares? (30)

 I have to admit, I am sometimes a bit too cynical. And when I am in a cynical mood, and I am thinking about non-functionals and RE, I come to the conclusion that ‘we’ don’t care about non-functionals. Maybe we do care, but I do not see the results in lots of end product that ‘we’ are making for the customer. I still see a lot of products where for instance the maintainability, the performance and/or the usability really sucks. (I don’t even dare to talk about security.) We already saw several examples of this in previous blogs in this series.

When trying to find explanations I ask students in the requirements and test trainings I do, about this phenomenon. I mean the phenomenon that we say that the non-functionals are important, but we don’t see the wanted (and needed) quality in the end products. Because everyone I talk to, says that non-functionals are important. But still, the main focus is on the functionality.

Wat kan Improve Quality Services voor u betekenen?

Maak een afspraak met één van onze experts via 040 202 18 03 of onze Contactpagina.

adviseren. leren. doen. Improve.


De Improve Quality Services website gebruikt cookies voor diverse functionaliteiten in de website, namelijk functionele cookies en websitestatistieken.

Lees onze privacy policy hier | Deze melding sluiten
Cookie instelling
Scroll naar top